Continuous production line reject system and method

ABSTRACT

A system, including: a sensor that monitors containers as the containers move along a production line; a rejection device; a controller communicatively connected to the sensor and the rejection device, wherein the controller is programmed to determine whether a container is associated with a match condition in response to a signal received from the sensor, the match condition reflecting that the container is associated with predetermined properties or characteristics, in response to a match condition, determine a pass result, and otherwise determine a fail result, determine a velocity of the production line, dynamically determine a correction amount for a reject position, track a position of the container on the production line, and in response to the fail result, outputs a signal to actuate the rejection device that removes the container from the production line based on the velocity of the production line, the dynamically determined correction amount, and the position of the container on the production line.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of application Ser. No.15/991,390, filed May 29, 2018, which is a continuation of applicationSer. No. 14/827,128, filed Aug. 14, 2015 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,008,078,issued Jun. 26, 2018), which is a continuation of application Ser. No.13/751,842, filed Jan. 28, 2013 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,147,326, issuedSep. 29, 2015), which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No.13/295,945, filed Nov. 14, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,368,550, issuedFeb. 5, 2013), which is a continuation of application Ser. No.12/328,549, filed on Dec. 4, 2008 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,077,051, issuedDec. 13, 2011), which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 12/207,856, filed on Sep. 10, 2008 (now U.S. Pat.No. 7,983,779, issued Jul. 19, 2011), which claims the benefit of U.S.Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/022,132, filed on Jan. 18, 2008. Allabove identified applications are hereby incorporated by reference intheir entireties.

BACKGROUND

Food processed in a manufacturing facility is highly controlled toensure safe conditions for consumers. The dangers in manufactured foodincludes equipment falling into the food, bacterial or fungalcontamination, and allergen contamination. The number of individualsparticularly children with food allergies has increased dramatically inthe last twenty years. Dairy and wheat are potentially deadly allergenscommon in processed foods. Even trace amounts of an allergen can causehealth issues.

To combat this problem, manufacturers process non-allergen versions oftheir products. Separate manufacturing lines are often constructed toavoid any trace contamination. In the event of cross-contamination,however, hours or days of production may need to be recalled to preventdistribution of tainted food products.

SUMMARY

A system, including: a sensor that monitors containers as the containersmove along a production line; a rejection device; a controllercommunicatively connected to the sensor and the rejection device,wherein the controller is programmed to determine whether a container isassociated with a match condition in response to a signal received fromthe sensor, the match condition reflecting that the container isassociated with predetermined properties or characteristics, in responseto a match condition, determine a pass result, and otherwise determine afail result, determine a velocity of the production line, dynamicallydetermine a correction amount for a reject position, track a position ofthe container on the production line, and in response to the failresult, outputs a signal to actuate the rejection device that removesthe container from the production line based on the velocity of theproduction line, the dynamically determined correction amount, and theposition of the container on the production line.

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows an exemplary manufacturing system that includes afail-to-safe system.

FIG. 2 shows an exemplary three-state sensor process for fail-to-safecode allergen detection.

FIGS. 3A and 3B show an exemplary fail-to-safe inspection process.

FIG. 4 shows an exemplary conveyor line with a rejection device.

FIG. 5 shows an exemplary method for activating the rejection device.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE IMPLEMENTATIONS

Food producers can reduce the risk of food allergies for consumers byimplementing a product handing fail-to-safe system, such as an examplefail-to-safe system 100 illustrated in FIG. 1. In general, fail-to-safesystems are systems that fail in a way such that no harm, or a minimumof harm, is caused to people or equipment.

In some embodiments, fail-to-safe systems may be configured usingcombinations of redundant inputs, outputs, feedback circuits, orcombinations of these or other circuits. For example, a fail-to-safesystem may be configured by using multiple parallel outputs to activatea circuit. A primary output may have one or more secondary outputs thatachieve the same task as the primary output. If the primary output wereto fail, the secondary output may still be able to activate the circuit.In another example, feedback circuits may be used to monitor an output.If the output fails, or the circuit fails to activate, the feedbackcircuit may be monitored to detect the failure and raise an alarm and/orinitiate a shutdown.

In some embodiments, voting logic may be used to create a fail-to-safesystem where redundant systems perform the same computation ormeasurement to determine a safe result. For example, two barcodescanners may be used to scan a single barcode. If the two scanners donot return a substantially identical result, the barcode may be rejectedsince there may be no way to determine which barcode scanner may haveread code correctly. In another example, three or more barcode scannersmay be used to scan a single barcode. If a majority of the barcodescanners return a substantially identical result, the barcode may beaccepted. One implementation of a barcode scanner can include a barcodescanner as described in the figures and description of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 10/283,781, filed on Oct. 30, 2002 by Long XiangBian et al. and entitled “Barcode Detection System,” such figures anddescription being incorporated herein by reference.

In the example of the fail-to-safe system 100, a fail-to-safeconfiguration of equipment can reduce the risk of food allergens byimplementing a redundant and fail-to-safe system to prevent allergenicfood products from being intermixed with non-allergenic food products.The fail-to-safe system 100 can include a conveyor 105. The conveyor iscontrolled by a controller 124. The controller 124 may include PLC(programmable logic controller). A suitable PLC is, for example, theAllen Bradley PLC 1400. The conveyor 105 moves a number of items, suchas an item 110, an item 115, and an item 120. In some embodiments, theitems 110-120 may be food products, ingredients, chemical substances, orother items that may be defined as allergenic or non-allergenic. In someembodiments, the items 110-120 may be filled or empty packagingmaterials, boxes, cartons, tubes, cans, cylinders, or other items thatcan be used to contain items that may be defined as allergenic ornon-allergenic.

The actual speed of conveyor 105 is unknown to controller 124 becausethe conveyor speed is set by another controller (upstream or downstreamof controller 124) not shown in the figures. The controller 124 monitorspulses output from a position encoder (See E in FIG. 1) mounted toconveyor 105. The encoder E may be an optical disc or magnetic disc thatcreates a fixed number of pulses per revolution. For example, theencoder E may produce a pulsed output that permits the controller 124 tomonitor the position of each product on the conveyor 105 to a resolutionof 0.1 inches per pulse (or 10 pulses per inch).

The item 110 includes a code 125, the item 115 includes a code 130, andthe item 120 includes a code 135. In some embodiments, the codes 125-135may be alphanumeric characters, symbols, codes (e.g., bar codes, datamatrix codes), colors, radio frequency identification (RFID) tags,magnetic stripes, or a combination of one or more of these and/or othercodes that may be used to identify and/or classify an item. For example,the code 125 may be a code that may directly identify an item as beingallergenic or non-allergenic. In another example, the code 125 may be acode that identifies the item 110, and the identity of the item 110 maybe used to query a list or database of items to determine if the item110 contains one or more allergens. In still other examples, the items110-120 may carry multiple codes that identify multiple allergens.

The codes 125-135 are used to classify the items 110-120. In someembodiments, the items may be classified by their contents. For example,the codes 125 and 130 may indicate that the items 110 and 115 are freeof wheat products, and the code 135 may indicate that the item 120contains an allergen such as wheat.

The fail-to-safe system 100 includes a sensor 137, a sensor 139, asensor 140, a sensor 145, and a sensor 150. In some embodiments, thesensors 137-139 can be configured to transmit a signal when the presenceof an item, such as item 110, is detected on the conveyor at a positionproximate the sensor 137-139. In some embodiments, the sensors 140-150may be configured to detect alphanumeric characters, symbols, codes(e.g., bar codes, data matrix codes), colors, radio frequencyidentification (RFID) tags, magnetic stripes, or other codes that may beused to identify and/or classify an item. The sensors 140-150 areconfigured to scan the codes 125-135 to determine the classification ofthe items 110-120. For example, the sensors 140-150 may be configured todetermine whether one or more of the items 110-120 are classified ascontaining an allergen, such as wheat or nuts.

In the illustrated example, the codes 125 and 130 indicate that theitems 110 and 115 are free of one or more allergens, whereas the code135 indicates that the item 120 contains an allergen. As the conveyor105 moves, the items 110-120 are scanned by sensors 140 and 145.

The fail-to-safe system 100 receives outputs from the sensors 137-150.The sensor system 137-155 can have three or more outputs, providinginformation to classify an item. For example, one output providesinformation to the sensor system 137-155 that the item can be classifiedas a match, a second output can provide information to the sensor system137-155 that the item is not a match, and a third output can provideinformation to the sensor system 137-155 that a malfunction has occurredin the sensor system 137-155. In some embodiments, a fourth output canbe received to provide information regarding an item's reject status. Insome embodiments, two outputs may be required to provide that twodifferent codes on an item are both matches.

Likewise, each of the sensors 140 and 145 can report one of three statesto a controller 155. The first state indicates that a sensed code (e.g.,the code 125) is a positive read (e.g., matches an expected code). Thesecond state indicates that a sensed code (e.g., the code 135) is anegative read (e.g., does not match an expected code). The third stateindicates that no signal has been received (e.g., no read wasperformed).

The second state that the sensors 140 and 145 may provide can cause thecontroller 155 respond in one or more ways. In some implementations, thecontroller 155 may respond by sending a signal to the controller 124 toreject each item that is not positively read. In other implementations,the controller 155 may send a signal to the controller 124 stop theconveyor when one or more of the sensors 140 and 145 reports the secondstate. In still other implementations, the controller 155 may count thenumber of negative reads that have been made by the sensors 140 and/or145. For example, the fail-to-safe system 100 may send a signal to thecontroller 124 shut down the conveyor 105 after two, three, four, ormore consecutive second state signals. In another example, thefail-to-safe system 100 may send a signal to the controller 124 shutdown the conveyor 105 if the ratio of negative to positive reads exceedsa threshold, for instance, a shutdown may be performed if three of thelast five are negative.

The sensors 140-145 can transmit a signal to a buffer in the controller155. For example, the buffer can receive an ASCII code to providepositive read information to indicate a match of an expected code.Likewise, the buffer can receive an ASCII code to receive a negativecode, such as a code providing that an error has occurred within thesensors 140-145. In such a situation where the buffer is cleared andreceives no new data after a set period of time, the controller 155 candetermine that no signal has been received. For example, if one of thesensors 140-150 becomes disconnected and does not provide input, thebuffer may have a default setting that the controller 155 is programmedto recognize as an error code. Alternatively, each time the buffer isrefreshed, a signal can be triggered in the controller 155 that thebuffer has refreshed. If the signal is not sent, the controller 155 candetermine that a new sensor signal has not been provided. Likewise, aheartbeat signal, or signal to mimic the period of time expected betweeneach container, can be used to determine if the register may berefreshed. In some implementations, the heartbeat signal can be providedto the controller 155. Similarly, an additional, redundant heartbeatsignal can be sent to the controller 155. The controller 155 can providea halt signal to the controller 124 that the system 100 is not operatingas configured. The controller 155 can shut down the conveyor 105 orreject all items until the buffer is refreshed.

In some embodiments, the sensor 137 and the sensor 139 can each transmita signal to the controller 155 that an item has been detected. Thecontroller 155 can then transmit a signal to the sensor 140 to enable itto scan the item. Likewise, the sensor 145 can also be enabled to scanthe item receiving a signal from the controller 155. In someembodiments, the controller 155 can send the signal after a period oftime, so that the item has time to travel to the sensor 140.Alternatively, the controller 155 can transmit the signal upon receivingthe signal from the sensors 137-139 that the item has been detected.

In some embodiments, the controller 155 can send a signal if one sensorsends a signal that an item has been detected. For example, if sensor137 detects an item, but sensor 139 does not transmit a signal that anitem has been detected, the controller 155 can still transmit a signalto sensors 140-145 to scan the item. In some embodiments, the controller155 can send a signal to the PLC 153 that the sensor 139 may bedisabled, broken, or in need of repair.

In some embodiments, the controller 155 may signal an alarm. Forexample, an alarm may be signaled if one or more of the sensors 140-150fails, if the conveyor 105 is stopped, if a rejected item is not sensedby the sensor 150, or for other events that may require an operator'sattention. In some embodiments, an alarm may be indicated using a visualindicator (e.g., a semaphore, light tree).

The sensors 140 and 145 provide signals to classify the items 110-120.For example, the controller 155 may receive signals that indicate thatboth of the sensors 140 and 145 have positively read the code 130. Thecontroller 155 responds by permitting the item 115 to continue down theconveyor 105. In examples where the controller 155 does not receivepositive identification signals from both of the sensors 140 and 145,the fail-to-safe system 100 fails to safe and sends a signal to thecontroller 124 to reject an item, such as the item 120. The controller155 will only allow the items 110-125 to stay on the conveyor 105 ifboth of the sensors 140 and 145 have positively read the codes. Anegative read by either or both of the sensors 140 and 145 will causethe system 100 to fail-to-safe and reject the offending item.

The fail-to-safe system 100 includes a diverter 160 and a reject path165. In some embodiments, the diverter 160 may be an arm, blade, pusher,stepper motor, servo motor, air cylinder, pneumatic blow-off, or otherdevice that can be activated to divert an item, such as the item 135,off the conveyor 105 and onto the reject path 165. In another example,the controller 155 may receive signals that indicate that both of thesensors 140 and 145 have not positively read the code 135, indicatingthat the item 120 was not expected on the conveyor 105 and may containan allergen. The controller 155 responds by sending a signal to thecontroller 124 to activate the diverter 160 to redirect the item 135onto the reject path 165.

The controller 155 generates a rejection signal that energizes and opensa normally closed valve by providing a pulse to a solenoid of aircylinder 160. This provides a pulse of air to rapidly extend a pistonrod of air cylinder 160 to knock an unacceptable container from theconveyor 105. In some embodiments, before the piston rod reaches fullstroke in its path toward an end wall, a retract valve is alreadybeginning to build pressure in the retract side of the air cylinder 160.The retract air pulse reaches maximum pressure when the piston rod hasmoved to its most extended position and begins to rebound from pistonseal shock absorbers of the air cylinder 160. The rebound force plus theretract pressure already building forces the extend side of the aircylinder 160 to exhaust rapidly thus reducing the normal time to retractthe piston rod. With this increased stroke speed, air cylinder 160 iscapable of rejecting products even when the products are touching or areseparated by a few thousandths of an inch.

The sensors 140 and 145 operate as a redundant, fail-to-safe pair. Insome implementations, a positive identification of an item (e.g., theitem 115) is made when the controller 155 detects that both of thesensors 140 and 145 have indicated that a positive read of the code 130has been made. In some implementations, a negative identification can bemade when the controller 155 receives signals from either or both of thesensors 140 and/or 145 that indicate that the code 130 was notpositively read. For example, the code 130 may have been marginallyidentifiable. The marginal quality of the code 130 may cause sensor 140to make a positive identification of the item 120 and the sensor 145 tomake a negative identification the item 120. The controller 155 detectsthis discrepancy and responds by rejecting the item 120.

In some implementations, the controller 155 may detect that one or bothof the sensors 140 and/or 145 have made no identification at all, andthe controller 155 may respond by sending a signal to the controller 124to stop the conveyor 105. In some implementations, the controller 155may respond to a failure of one of the sensors 140 or 145 by relying onthe one active sensor and setting a service alarm to indicate that thefailed sensor is in need of service.

Items, such as the item 135, on the reject path 165 pass by the sensor150. As the item 135 moves past the sensor 150, the sensor 150 sensesthe code 135 and provides a detection signal to the controller 155. Insome implementations, the controller 155 may use a signal from thesensor 150 to confirm that the item 120 has been removed from theconveyor 105. In some implementations, the controller 155 may detectthat the sensor 150 has not detected the item 120 and send a signal tothe controller 124 stop the conveyor 105 until line operators caninspect the items 110-120 to ensure that an allergenic item is removedfrom the conveyor 105.

Although the fail-to-safe system 100 has been described in terms ofidentifying items 110-120 to detect allergenic products, otherimplementations may exist. In some implementations, the fail-to-safesystem 100 may be used to identify items by make, model, brand, or othercriteria that may be used to classify items. For example, a factory mayuse the conveyor 105 to produce similar products (e.g., frozen pizzas,canned vegetables, sodas) under two or more brand names. Thefail-to-safe system 100 may be used to reject incorrectly brandedproducts that have been detected on the conveyor 105.

In some implementations, the fail-to-safe system 100 may be used toidentify items by size, quality, quantity, or other criteria that may beused to classify items. For example, the sensors 140 and 145 may beconfigured to perform and confirm visual inspections of the items110-120 to perform counts (e.g., the number of pills in a blister pack),optical measurements (e.g., inspecting the prescription of lenses,counting the teeth on gears), or color measurements (e.g., to evaluatethe quality of meats, to evaluate the ripeness of vegetables). In someimplementations, the sensors 140 and 145 may be configured to performand confirm other types of inspections. For example, the sensors 140 and145 may detect metal in food products, the conductivity of an electricalcircuit, the fidelity of a speaker, the viscosity of a liquid, or otherqualities of the items 110-120 that may be detected with a sensor.

In some embodiments, if the controller 155 fails, the fail-to-safesystem 100 can still fail safely. For example, the diverter 160 may beconfigured so that the item 110 will be allowed to continue along theconveyor 105 only when activated by the controller 124 receiving asignal from the controller 155 to do so. If the controller 155 fails, nosignal is sent to activate the diverter 160, and the item 110 will bediverted to the reject path 165.

In some embodiments, the sensor system 137-155 can be bypassed so thatif it is malfunctioning, the conveyor 105 can still run. For example,personnel can lock out the sensor system 137-155 and put the sensorsystem 137-155 into bypass mode so that the fail-to-safe behavior is nolonger operational, but the items 110-120 still travel on the conveyor105.

In some embodiments, the controller 155 may shut down the conveyor 105using a relay. In some embodiments, the relay may include redundantcontacts and/or multiple channels. For example, the relay may includemultiple contacts so if one contact fails (e.g., welds, burns), anothercontact may still be used to stop the conveyor 105. In some embodiments,the relay may be monitored by the controller 155. For example, thecontroller 155 may send a first signal to activate the relay using afirst relay channel, and the controller 155 may verify the activation ofthe relay by monitoring a second signal that is connected through asecond relay channel.

In some embodiments, the configuration of one of the sensors 140-150 canbe copied to a replacement sensor. For example, the sensors 140 and 145may have a common configuration, and if one of the sensors 140 or 145fails, a technician may be able to copy the common configuration fromthe remaining operational sensor to the replacement sensor.

In some implementations, a physical key to take the apparatus offlinecan be used. For example, the physical key can be used to put the system100 into a bypass mode. In some implementations, the bypass mode can beinitiated if the system 100 has a component failure. For example, if thecontroller 155 or one or more of the sensors 137-150 fails, the sensorsystem 137-155 can operate in bypass mode. As such, the conveyor 105 cancontinue to operate while a component undergoes maintenance or repair.

In some embodiments, the system 100 may include a semaphore (e.g., lighttree). The semaphore may display various patterns of lights to indicatethe state of the sensor system 137-155. For example, the semaphore mayshow a green light if the sensor system 137-155 is operating normally,or show a yellow light if the sensor 150 is blocked. The semaphore mayindicate various alarm states. For example, the semaphore may blink ared light if an allergenic item has not been detected by the sensor 150.

In some embodiments, the sensor system 137-155 may include a semaphoreand/or other visual indicators to provide a visual feedback when a lineoperator is configuring the sensor system 137-155. For example, the lineoperator may wish to reconfigure the sensors 140-155 to identify a newcode. The line operator may turn a selector switch from a “RUN” positionto a “TEACH” position, and the controller 155 may cause the semaphore toblink a green light to indicate that the “TEACH” mode is active. Theline operator may present the new code to one or more of the sensors140-150 to teach the new code to the sensors 140-150. The operator mayhave the option to confirm that the new code has been taught bypresenting the new code to the sensors 140-150 a second time, anddetermine if the new code has been taught by observing the illuminationof a green “match” indicator. If the new code was not taught, a red “nomatch” indicator may illuminate. The operator may turn the selectorswitch to the “RUN” mode, and the controller may respond by illuminatinga steady green light.

In some embodiments, the controller 155 may log items 110-120 accordingto the time they are scanned. For example, a log can record the time anitem is scanned and the state of the item. In some embodiments, the logcan be transmitted to a server so that the log can be viewed fromvarious locations. In some embodiments, the log can be viewed through apassword-protected website. For example, if several controllers allupload logs to the server, a user can view rejects on multiple lines oranalyze various changes in rejects over time.

In some embodiments, the semaphore may indicate the state of the sensorsystem 137-155 during a configuration process. For example, thesemaphore may blink green when the system 100 has been set to a “teach”mode, display a steady red light when placed in a “bypass” mode.

FIG. 2 shows an example three-state sensor process 200 for fail-to-safecode detection. In general, the process assumes that a SENSOR_FAIL stateexists (e.g., one or more sensors have failed) unless a signal from thesensor is detected. A functional sensor may respond with a signal thatindicates that a code (e.g., the code 125 of FIG. 1) either matches anexpected code, or that the sensor does not read an expected code. A codematch will cause a MATCH state to be set, and no code read will cause aNO_READ state to be set. If no MATCH or NO_READ state has been set, thenthe SENSOR_FAIL state will remain set. This state can occur because ofan actual sensor failure, or because the code does not match theexpected code.

The process 200 starts when a SENSOR_FAIL is set (202). As an item(e.g., the item 110 of FIG. 1) moves down a conveyor (e.g., the conveyor105), a first sensor (e.g., the sensor 137 of FIG. 1) is triggered(204), and a second sensor (e.g., the sensor 139 of FIG. 1) is triggered(206). In some embodiments, the first and second sensors 137-139 may bepresence detectors. For example, the detectors may be break-beamdetectors, photo-eyes, ultrasonic rangefinders, Hall-effect sensors, orother sensors that may be used to detect the presence of an item.

The first and second sensors 137-139 form a redundant pair. When eitheror both of the sensors 137-139 are triggered (204)-(206), a controllersuch as the controller 155 of FIG. 1 activates a third sensor (208) tosense a code (e.g., the code 125). In some embodiments, the third sensormay be a sensor that can identify a code (e.g., the sensor 140 of FIG.1). In some embodiments, the controller 155 may increment a barcodecycle register when a trigger signal is detected.

If one of the first and/or second sensors 137-139 fails to trigger(210), then a trigger alarm is set (212). In some implementations, thetrigger alarm may alert line operators that one of the sensors 137-139may have malfunctioned and needs service. If the third sensor 140 doesnot respond (214) within a predetermined timeout period, then theSENSOR_FAIL state remains (216). In some embodiments, multiplesuccessive sensor and/or trigger failures may trigger an alarm. Forexample, if the third sensor 140 to respond (214) for three successiveitems, an alarm may be set to cause a shutdown of the conveyor. Inanother example, an alarm may be set if three of the last five items didnot cause the sensor 140 to respond (214).

If the third sensor 140 responds (214) within the predetermined timeoutperiod, the response will indicate whether a match for the code has beenmade. If a match is sensed (218), then a MATCH state is set (220). If noread is sensed, then a NO_READ state is set (222).

In some embodiments, the SENSOR_FAIL, MATCH, and/or NO_READ states maybe accompanied by visual indications for a line operator. For example,when a MATCH state is set (220), an output signal may be activated toilluminate a green “match” indicator. When a NO_READ state is set (222),an output signal may be activated to illuminate a red “no read”indicator.

In some embodiments, the process 200 may include a machine cyclecounter. The machine cycle counter may be indexed whenever the processis started for an item. If the machine cycle count indexes and notrigger signal is sent to the controller, the SENSOR_FAIL state remainsin effect and the item is rejected. In some implementations, rejectingitems in response to a sensor failure may cause the process to continuewithout items on the conveyor 105.

FIGS. 3A and 3B show an example fail-to-safe inspection process 300. Theprocess 300 starts when a first sensor is activated (302) by an item(e.g., the item 110 of FIG. 1) travelling on a conveyor (e.g., theconveyor 105 of FIG. 1). In some embodiments, the first sensor may bethe sensor 140 of FIG. 1.

In some embodiments, the first sensor may be activated when the item(e.g., the item 110 of FIG. 1) is within the sensing range of thesensor. For example, the first sensor 140 may be a vision inspectionsystem that may self-trigger when an item is detected within the visioninspection system's field of view. In another example, the first sensor140 may be a radio frequency identification (RFID) reader thatcontinually polls for the presence of an RFID tag that may be includedwith the item. When the item and the included RFID tag come within rangeof the RFID reader, the RFID reader may detect the presence of the RFIDtag and activate a reading process.

In some embodiments, the first sensor 140 may be activated by anexternal trigger. For example, the first sensor may be a barcode scannerthat is triggered by a break-beam detector (e.g., the sensor 137 of FIG.1), or similar device. When the item passes by the trigger device 137,an activation signal may be sent to activate the first sensor 140.

When the first sensor 140 is activated (302), a timer is started 304.When the item passes by a second sensor (e.g., the sensor 145 of FIG.1), the second sensor is activated (306). In some embodiments, the firstsensor 140 and the second sensor 145 may be the same type, make, model,and/or configuration of sensor device. In some embodiments, the firstsensor's configuration may be copied to the second sensor 145 byconnecting the sensors together.

Occasionally, the second sensor 145 may not be activated. For example,the second sensor 145 may develop a fault and be unable to be activated.In this example, the timer that was previously started (304) may timeout when the first and second sensors 140-145 fail to activate withinthe timeout period. If a sensor timeout has been detected (308), then aSENSOR_FAIL state is set (310), and a machine stop operation isperformed (312).

If no sensor timeout has been detected (308), then the sensor readingsare compared (314) to verify that the sensor readings are the same. Ifthe comparison (314) is not provided a readable code to compare, then aNO_READ state is set (316) to indicate that a readable code is notavailable.

If the comparison (314) determines that the readings are the same, thenthe sensor readings are compared (318) to verify that the sensors haveread a match for the expected identity of the item. If the comparison(318) determines that a match has been made, then a MATCH state is set.The item is not rejected, and the process 300 waits for the first sensorto be activated (302).

In some implementations, the process 300 may include an operation toactivate a fail-to-safe rejection device when a MATCH state is set(320). For example, the rejection device 160 of FIG. 1 may be configuredto always divert items to the reject path 165 unless it is activated toallow an item to pass.

If the comparison (318) cannot determine a code, then the NO_READ stateis set (316). When a NO_READ state is set (316), the item that causedthe NO_READ state may be an allergenic item that should be rejected. Theprocess 300 continues in FIG. 3B where a reject timer is started (322).A reject device (e.g., the diverter 160) is activated (324) to divertthe item to the reject path (e.g., the reject path 165). In someimplementations, the reject device 160 may be a fail-to-safe rejectdevice that is normally set to reject items unless otherwise activated,and may not need to be activated (324) to direct the item to the rejectpath 165.

The process waits to receive a signal from a reject path sensor (e.g.,the sensor 150 of FIG. 1). If the rejected item is detected (326) withina predetermined time measured by the reject timer, the item isdetermined to have been properly rejected and the process 300 continuesby waiting for the first sensor 140 to be activated 302.

If the rejected item is not detected (326), then a safety relay isde-energized (328). In some embodiments, de-energizing (328) the safetyrelay may cause the conveyor 105 to stop. A REJECT_CONFIRM fault alarmis set (330) to alert a line operator. In some embodiments, theREJECT_CONFIRM fault alarm may trigger an audible and/or visualindicator, such as a semaphore (e.g., a light tree). A machine stopoperation is then performed (332).

In some implementations, the REJECT_CONFIRM fault alarm and thesubsequent machine stop operation (332) may be performed to prevent anallergenic item from being passed. For example, a REJECT_CONFIRM faultalarm may occur because an item that was expected to be rejected was notdetected as being properly rejected. Therefore, a possibility existsthat an allergenic item may still be on the conveyor 105. In thisexample, the conveyor 105 may be stopped to allow a line operator toremove items from the conveyor 105 to prevent a possibly allergenic itemfrom passing.

In some implementations, a machine stop can be called using anindependent safety relay channel A in parallel with an independentchannel B of a relay circuit to drive an emergency stop circuit. Assuch, a fault signal can be received if an input does not reach themachine. For example, a relay with two independent channels may beconnected to a machine stop output of a controller (e.g., the controller155 of FIG. 1) so the two independent channels may be energized when theline starts up. In this example, the independent channels mayde-energize when the line stops. The independent channels mayde-energize for a NO_READ state. If an outside event occurs, such as anelectrical surge causing damage, the relay channel contacts may drop. Inthis example, the relay may trigger a machine shutdown even if one ofthe relay channels has malfunctioned (e.g., the contacts have welded).

In some implementations, a safety relay may provide feedback to acontroller (e.g., the controller 155 of FIG. 1) by using two or moreindependent sets of contacts when energized. For example, the relay maybe energized by an output of the controller to actuate a first set ofcontacts that close or open a circuit (e.g., a machine shutdown circuit,a diverter activation circuit). When energized, the relay also opens orcloses a second set of contacts that are monitored by the controller toprovide a signal that confirms the activation of the relay.

In some implementations, a safety relay may provide feedback to acontroller (e.g., the controller 155 of FIG. 1) by using two or morerelays in series. For example, the controller may activate a first relayto close or open a first circuit (e.g., a safety circuit, a rejectiondevice activation circuit, an alarm circuit). The first circuit may beconnected to energize or de-energize a second relay, and the secondrelay may be used to switch a feedback signal that may be monitored bythe controller. The second relay may be monitored to confirm that thefirst circuit has been activated.

In some implementations, more than one output from a sensor can bedetermined. For example, one output can be used to trigger the sensorand another output can transmit a signal to trigger a code cyclecounter. In some implementations, a trigger signal outside the sensorcan be sent to the sensor and to trigger a code cycle counter.

The illustrated examples have given several descriptions of the system100 of FIG. 1, the process 300 of FIG. 2, and the process 300 of FIGS.3A and 3B, may be used for processing food-related items, otherembodiments may exist. For example, the sensors 140 and 145 may be apair of vision inspection systems, and the item 110 may be a blisterpack of pills. The sensors 140 and 145 may inspect the blister pack toverify that the blister pack contains the correct number and type ofpill. In another example, the item 110 may be a machined part, such as abolt, and the sensors 140 and 145 may inspect the bolt to verify thatthe bolt is the correct length, diameter, and/or head size. In yetanother example, the sensors 140 and 145 may be x-ray inspection systemsconfigured to inspect cuts of meat for bone fragments, to inspect winebottles for glass shards, or to inspect stuffed toys for needles thatmay have been lost in the toys' sewing process.

In some implementations, the process 200 may be used to sort packages ina shipping terminal. For example, a shipped package may have a barcodethat contains the package's destination address and/or shipping zone. Asthe package travels down a conveyor, the package may pass a redundantpair of photo eyes. As the photo eyes sense the package, each photo eyemay send a trigger signal to a controller, such as a programmable logiccontroller (PLC). When the controller receives the trigger signal fromthe first photo eye, the controller may start a timer to measure theamount of time between the arrival of the trigger signal and the second.

If the second trigger signal is not received within a predeterminedperiod, such as 500 ms, the controller may determine that the secondphoto eye has malfunctioned and respond by setting a sensor failurealarm. In other examples, the controller may sense the second triggersignal without a preceding first trigger signal, determine that thefirst sensor has malfunctioned, and respond by setting a sensor failurealarm. The controller may respond to the receipt of one or both triggersignals by activating a barcode scanner. In other embodiments, signalsfrom one or both of the photo eyes may be used to trigger the barcodescanner directly. The barcode scanner may be activated immediately, orafter a period that allows the package to travel within the sensingrange of the barcode scanner.

In some embodiments, the controller may set a SENSOR_FAIL state beforeactivating the barcode scanner. If the barcode scanner does not returnan identification signal within a timeout period, the SENSOR_FAIL statemay remain active. The SENSOR_FAIL state may be used to trigger an alarmto alert line operators that the barcode scanner may have malfunctioned.

When activated, the barcode scanner may begin to scan for thedestination barcode on the package to determine of the barcode matches apreconfigured criterion. For example, the barcode may include a shippingzone code, a ZIP code, country code, state code, or combinations ofthese or other information that may be used to sort and/or route shippedpackages to the correct destination. In other examples, the barcodescanner may be configured to evaluate the information contained by thebarcode, or to evaluate the quality of the barcode itself. For example,the barcode scanner may be configured to verify that the destinationaddress includes a street address, a city, a state, and a ZIP code. Inother examples, the barcode scanner may be configured to reject packageswith smudged or otherwise damaged barcodes by rating the quality of thebarcode itself. For example, a substantially ideal barcode may bescanned and given a score of “100”, whereas a barcode that has beenpartly torn off may only be given a score of “40”. If the barcodematches the preconfigured criterion, then a MATCH signal may be sent tothe controller. If the barcode cannot be read, then a NO_READ signal maybe sent to the controller.

In some embodiments, the barcode scanner may be configured to performthe evaluation of the scanned barcode and/or barcode information. Insome embodiments, the barcode scanner may read the barcode and returnthe scanned barcode information to the controller for evaluation.

When the controller receives a signal from the barcode scanner, theSENSOR_FAIL state may end. If a MATCH signal is received, then thecontroller may set a MATCH state and may allow the package to continueon the conveyor. If a NO_READ signal is received, then the controllermay set a NO_READ state and activate a rejection device to direct thepackage off the conveyor. If the barcode scanner does not return anidentification signal within a timeout period, the SENSOR_FAIL state mayremain active.

In some embodiments, the system 100 may include features to protectcomponents of the system 100 from water, dust, humidity, or othersubstances that may damage the controller 155 and/or other components ofthe system 100. For example, the controller 155 may be housed in a NEMA4X, IP65 sealed enclosure. The NEMA enclosure may include washdown-ratedpassthroughs for the sensors' 140-150 cables, power connections, data(e.g., serial, Ethernet, DeviceNet) connections, and/or other cables. Anexample of such passthroughs are “icotek” modular cable managementsystems commercially available from icotek GmbH, or Eschach, Germany.

In some embodiments, the system 100 may include a product verificationmodule to teach a new code to the system 100. For example, the system100 may need to input a new code for a changeover on the product beingproduced. The system 100 may require the operator to input the new code.The code may be manually input to the system using a keypad. Theoperator may scan the code with an RFID reader to input the code to thesystem. Similarly, the system 100 may have a database of codes savedthat the operator can select.

In some implementations, the system 100 may already contain a pluralityof codes and their phrase-equivalent, so that the operator can visuallycheck that the code entered is correct. For example, the system 100 maystore the text “Whole Grain Cereal Squares” for a certain code and thetext “Frosted Cereal Squares” for another code. If the product to bemade is “Whole Grain Cereal Squares”, but the system 100 receives thecode for “Frosted Cereal Squares”, the operator may read “Frosted CerealSquares” and prevent the system 100 running with the incorrect code. Insome implementations, the system 100 may require the operator to press abutton “Accept” on the display to verify that the phrase-equivalentmatches the product scheduled to be made. Alternatively, the operatorcan be required to enter the same code twice into the system 100 beforethe code is accepted.

In some embodiments, the operator can use a mechanical key or a passcodeto verify that they are allowed to change the code in the system 100.For example, if the operator wants to enter a new code to the system100, the system 100 may first require a key to be inserted before thesystem 100 may be taught any new codes. The system 100 may also requirean electronic key. The electronic key may, for example, may provide fora specific level of access rights for a particular user. The electronickey may be used with an electronic key adapter that can transfer data tothe controller 124 or the PLC 153. The electronic key may be stored onan employee badge. The electronic key may also be included on an RFIDchip. The system 100 may also use a fingerprint scanner or retinalscanner to receive data as an electronic key.

In some implementations, the system 100 may require a supervisor orother employee to provide a credential key, e.g., a key only provided toindividuals with certain levels of responsibilities. The credential keymay be a passcode, a mechanical key, or an electronic key. The system100 may require an individual who is offline to approve a new code. Forexample, an e-mail may be sent to a manager to approve a code, where thecode may be taught to the system only when the manager sends a replye-mail to the system 100.

In some implementations, the system 100 can require two separate keys,e.g., mechanical keys, electronic keys, passcodes, or a combination ofmechanical keys, electronic keys, and passcodes. For example, the system100 may require the keys to belong to two separate operators. The system100 may require one key from the operator and one from a supervisor.Likewise, the keys may be both credential keys. In still otherembodiments, each permitted operator may receive an electronic key thatis traceable to the permitted operator. For example, the system 100 mayrequire that two or more operators insert their electronic keys intoelectronic key adapters at the same time.

In some implementations, the system 100 may perform an automated checkto determine if the input is correct. For example, the system 100 maysend a request to the controller 124 to determine the scanned materialsto the line to determine if the code is associated with the scannedmaterials. The scanned materials may include a code that may be input tothe system. Alternatively, associations between the codes and materialsmay be stored in the system 100 or offline. Similarly, the system 100may send a request to a planning or logistics database for dataregarding the next planned product change. If the input code does notmatch the planned code, the system 100 may reject the input code.Alternatively, the system 100 may require override measures, e.g.,multiple keys, a credential key, or an offline authorization.

It a product fails inspection according to one or more sensors 137, 139,140, or 145, the product may be rejected by mechanism 160. It isnecessary to keep track of the failed product as it moves down theconveyor 105 to rejection device 160. The rejection device and/or itsassociated controller must be apprised of which product is coming alongthe conveyor that was earlier determined to have failed inspection. Infact, several products are continually monitored at one time and when aparticular product arrives in front of the rejection mechanism 160, itmust be rejected. Actuation of the rejection mechanism may be controlledbased on position of the failed product and reject time (i.e., a timefrom when controller 124 sends a signal to actuate rejection mechanism160 until rejection mechanism 160 makes contact with the failedproduct).

FIG. 4 shows an example of conveyor 150 with a product inspection device(sensors 137, 139, 140, and/or 145) and rejection mechanism 160. In thisexample, the products are packages that are each 5 inches wide with 1inch gaps between them. The conveyor speed is a constant 400 feet perminute (FPM). At a constant speed of 400 FPM, the packages travel 1 inchin 12.5 milliseconds. If the inspection at package position 1 in FIG. 4determines that the package fails the inspection criteria, thecontroller 124 will need to activate the rejection mechanism 160 at theappropriate time in order to knock of the moving package off of theconveyor 150. The package, which failed inspection at position 1, willbe at position 10 (location of rejection device which is 60 inches awayfrom position 1) 750 ms (12.5 ms/in×60 inches) after the inspection atposition 1. However, the system also needs to account for the time takento overcome the relatively fixed static inertia of the rejection device160. For example, it may take 50 ms for the rejection device to makecontact with a package at position 10 after receiving an actuationsignal from controller 124. Thus, the controller 124 would issue theactuation signal to the rejection device 160 at 700 ms (750 ms-50 ms) inorder to hit the moving package.

Rather than using time, an encoder based system may be used. Encoder Eoutputs 10 pulses per inch of conveyor movement. Thus, using the 60 inchdistance between the product inspection point and the rejection pointshown in FIG. 4, the distance to the rejection point from the inspectionpoint is 600 pulses regardless of conveyor speed. Without consideringthe delay caused by the static inertia of the rejection mechanism, therejection mechanism would fire when the conveyor 150 travels anequivalent of 600 pulses. To compensate for the 50 ms it takes toovercome the static inertia of the rejection mechanism, 40 pulses aresubtracted from the 600 pulses. The value of 40 pulses is calculatedfrom the formulaT÷(1/V)×P=PA, where  (1)T is the reject time between the time the controller 124 sends theactuation signal to the rejection mechanism 160 and the rejectionmechanism 160 makes contact with the package; pulse adjustment. In theabove example, T=50 ms, 1/V is 12.5 ms/inch, P is 10 pulses per inch,and PA is thus 40 pulses. Thus, the controller 124 would activate therejection mechanism after 540 pulses (600 pulses−40 pulses) in order tohit the package at reject position 10. However, this approach assumesthat the conveyor velocity is constant.

In order to manage a constantly variable speed conveyor belt, the systemmay be programmed to dynamically combine both position and reject timeto determine when to fire the rejection device. In one exemplaryembodiment, the setup shown in FIG. 4 is used, along with an encoderthat outputs 10 pulses per inch, and a variable speed conveyor.According to the exemplary process in FIG. 5, a product arrives atinspection point 1 in step 501. In step 503, controller 124 startstracking the product position on conveyor 150 by counting encoder pulsessince the package arrived at inspection point 1 while waiting for theinspection result to be decided.

In step 505, controller 124 determines a real-time velocity of theconveyor 150. The real-time velocity of the conveyor may be determinedby monitoring the elapsed time between the last two pulses output by theencoder as the package moves along with conveyor 150. Velocity may bemeasured in other ways, for example, by averaging over a predeterminednumber of pulses (e.g., average over 10 pulses). As conveyor 150increases in speed, the time between pulses decreases. As conveyor 150decreases in speed, the time between pulses increases. The controller124 is able to determine the increases and decreases in conveyor speedbased on monitoring the elapsed time between the last two pulses ormonitoring a change in speed based on an average of several pulses. Forexample, the velocity V of the conveyor (represented as pulses persecond) is 1/t, where t is a difference in time between the last twopulses or t may be determined from an average of a predetermined numberof pulses.

The controller could determine a real-time velocity of the conveyor 150by measuring input pulse frequency for every predetermined length ofconveyor travel (every ⅛ of an inch for example) or by measuringconveyor speed every predetermined per unit of time (i.e., number ofpulses every 2 or 5 ms). Rather than deriving real-time conveyor speedbased on the pulses output by encoder E, various sensors could also beincorporated into the system to measure conveyor speed (i.e., an opticalsensor 2000 to measure conveyor speed).

In step 507, the controller 12 dynamically determines the PA (pulseadjustment) or correction amount and the number of pulses that wouldtrigger the activation of the rejection mechanism 160 if a packagefailed inspection. The P A or correction amount may be dynamicallydetermined through recalculation whenever a predetermined number ofpulses are detected (i.e., every 2 pulses, 3 pulses, etc.). Thecontroller 124 may be programmed with an initial preset pulse countvalue at which to activate the rejection device 150 if the packagefailed inspection. Based on the example discussed above, the controller124 may be programmed with a default value that activates rejectiondevice 160 after 560 pulses (i.e., assuming a constant conveyor speed of400 FPM). Other preset values could be used. The controller is furtherprogrammed to dynamically adjust the number of pulses that indicate whento trigger the rejection mechanism 160 in case of inspection failure;this adjustment being dynamic and based on the PA or correction amount.As conveyor speed increases, pulses are subtracted from the defaultvalue of 560 pulses. As conveyor speed decreases, pulses are add to thedefault value of 560 pulses.

For example, the conveyor speed may be changed from 400 FPS to 800 FPS,which may take the effect over a matter of second or minutes. In step507, the controller 124 uses equation (1) supra to dynamically determinethe PA (pulse adjustment), which is then dynamically applied (i.e.,added or subtracted) to the initial preset pulse count value todetermine at what pulse count the rejection mechanism is activated.

In step 509, the controller 124 determines whether the encoder pulsecount has reached the initial preset pulse count value corrected by thePA (pulse adjustment). If the answer at step 509 is yes, the processproceeds to step 511 and controller 124 determines whether the packagepassed the inspection. If the package passed inspection (yes at step511), then the process proceeds to step 517 and the rejection mechanismis not activated when the package is at the rejection point (position 10in FIG. 4). If the package failed inspection (no at step 511), theprocess proceeds to step 515 the controller 124 sends an actuationsignal to the rejection device to reject the package at the rejectionpoint (position 10 in FIG. 4).

If the answer at step 509 is no (the encoder count value does not equalthe initial preset pulse count value corrected by the PA), then theprocess proceeds back to step 505.

In the above examples, it was assumed that the amount of time needed toovercome the static inertia of the rejection device 160 is 50 ms (rejecttime). However, the system may dynamically measure reject time. Forexample, if the rejection device 160 includes a rod extended by asolenoid, a reflector 160A may be disposed on top of the rod. A laser170 and sensor 180 may be mounted above the conveyor 150 at rejectionpoint 10. When the rod of rejection device 160 makes contact with thepackage on the conveyor, light from the laser 170 reflects off of thereflector 160A and is received back at the sensor 180. The controller124 can determine the difference in time between when the actuationsignal is provided to the rejection device and when the laser light isreceived by the sensor. This difference in time is reject time. Thisreject time advantageously accounts for total system action time (i.e.,friction in the rejection mechanism, signal delay between the controller124 and rejection mechanism 160, and compression and lag time associatedwith air pressure when rejection mechanism 160 is an air coil). Thereject time may be determined and stored in a memory that is accessibleto the controller 124.

When rejection mechanism 160 is an air coil, the system may also includean air pressure sensor and air accumulator 190. When the air pressuresensor detects a predetermined change in air pressure for the air coil,an alarm can be activated and the conveyor 150 may be stopped. Airpressure sensor and air accumulator 190 also may maintain a constant airpressure for the air cylinder. Air pressure sensor and air accumulator190 may be embodied in one or multiple components, and inclusion of onedoes not necessarily require inclusion of the other.

A number of embodiments of the invention have been described.Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may bemade without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thenumbers provided in the discussion of the various embodiments are onlyexamples, and other values may be used without departing from the spiritand scope of the invention. Accordingly, other embodiments are withinthe scope of the following claims.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A system comprising: a continuousproduction line comprising a first conveyor path and a second conveyorpath; a data repository configured to store data for a plurality ofelectronic keys, wherein each key of the plurality of electronic keys isassociated with at least one level of a plurality of levels of authorityassociated with configuring the continuous production line foroperation; a first scanning device that detects key data associated witha respective key of the plurality of electronic keys, wherein therespective key is presented to the first scanning device, and responsiveto the detecting, transmits the key data; at least one second scanningdevice that scans each item of a plurality of items as the plurality ofitems moves along the first conveyor path of the continuous productionline, and responsive to the scanning, transmits respective scaninformation associated with the respective item; a rejection devicepositioned adjacent to an intersection between the first conveyor pathand the second conveyor path; and a controller communicatively connectedto the first scanning device, the at least one second scanning device,and the rejection device, wherein the controller is programmed toreceive, from the first scanning device, the key data, determine,responsive to receiving the key data, the respective at least one levelof the plurality of levels of authority associated with the key data,enable, responsive to determining the respective at least one level ofauthority, one or more actions for configuring the system for processingthe plurality of items on the continuous production line, wherein theone or more actions are associated with one or more of the respective atleast one level of authority, upon configuration of the system forprocessing the plurality of items on the continuous production line viathe one or more actions associated with the respective at least onelevel of authority, receive, from the at least one second scanningdevice, the respective scan information, detect, for one or more of theplurality of items, a correspondence between a first product of aplurality of products and the scan information for the respective item,and responsive to detecting a lack of correspondence between the firstproduct and the scan information for the respective item, causeactuation of the rejection device for moving the respective item fromthe first conveyor path to the second conveyor path.
 2. The system ofclaim 1, wherein each of the plurality of keys is associated with arespective user of a plurality of users, and wherein each of theplurality of users has an assigned at least one level of the pluralityof levels of authority.
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein at least oneof the plurality of levels of authority is a supervisory level ofauthority for authorizing a switch from the first product to a secondproduct of the plurality of products for processing on the continuousproduction line.
 4. The system of claim 3, wherein the controller isfurther programmed to enable, responsive to determining that therespective key data is associated with the supervisory level ofauthority, the switch from the first product to the second product forprocessing on the continuous production line, wherein the respective keydata for the supervisory level of authority is received subsequent toreceiving other key data for a non-supervisory level of authority. 5.The system of claim 1, wherein one of the plurality of levels ofauthority associated with a respective electronic key allows therespective user to enter a product code associated with another productof the plurality of products at an input/output interface of thecontroller.
 6. The system of claim 5, wherein enabling the one or moreactions for configuring the system includes enabling, upon receiving thekey data for the respective electronic key, product code inputs at theinput/output interface.
 7. The system of claim 6, wherein the controlleris further programmed to switch, responsive to receiving an input at theinput/output interface corresponding to the product code for the anotherproduct, from detecting the correspondence between the scan informationfor the respective item and the first product to detecting acorrespondence between the scan information for the respective item andthe another product.
 8. The system of claim 1, wherein each of theplurality of levels of authority is associated with predetermined accessrights associated with configuring the system for operation.
 9. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein one or more of the predetermined accessrights associated with one or more of the plurality of levels ofauthority are associated with transferring data from an external datasource to the controller.
 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the firstscanning device comprises a RFID scanner for detecting a key stored on aRFID chip.
 11. The system of claim 1, wherein the first scanning devicecomprises at least one of a fingerprint scanner and a retinal scannerfor detecting a biometric electronic key.
 12. The system of claim 1,wherein the respective scan information includes a magnetic codeassociated with one of the plurality of products.
 13. A methodcomprising: detecting, at a first scanning device for a continuousproduction line, key data for an electronic key presented to the firstscanning device, wherein the electronic key is one of a plurality ofelectronic keys, each electronic key of the plurality of electronic keysbeing associated with a respective user of a plurality of system users,and wherein each of the plurality of system users has at least oneassigned level of a plurality of levels of authority for configuring thecontinuous production line for operation; determining, by a controllerresponsive to receiving the key data from the first scanning device, therespective at least one level of the plurality of levels of authorityassociated with the key data; enabling, by the controller responsive todetermining the respective at least one level of authority associatedwith the key data, one or more actions for configuring the continuousproduction line to process a plurality of items, wherein the one or moreactions are associated with one or more levels of the respective atleast one level of authority for the respective user; and uponconfiguration of the continuous production line for processing theplurality of items via the one or more actions associated with therespective one or more levels of authority, receiving, by the controllerfrom at least one second scanning device that scans each of theplurality of items on the continuous production line, respective scaninformation associated with the respective item, detecting, by thecontroller for one or more of the plurality of items, a correspondencebetween a first product of a plurality of products and the scaninformation for the respective item, and responsive to detecting a lackof correspondence between the first product and the scan information forthe respective item, causing actuation, by the controller, of arejection device for moving the respective item from a first conveyorpath to a second conveyor path of the continuous production line. 14.The method of claim 13, wherein at least one of the plurality of levelsof authority is a supervisory level of authority for authorizing aswitch from the first product to a second product of the plurality ofproducts for processing on the continuous production line.
 15. Themethod of claim 14, wherein the controller is further programmed toenable, responsive to determining that the respective key data isassociated with the supervisory level of authority, the switch from thefirst product to the second product for processing on the continuousproduction line, wherein the respective key data for the supervisorylevel of authority is received subsequent to receiving other key datafor a non-supervisory level of authority.
 16. The method of claim 13,wherein one of the plurality of levels of authority associated with arespective electronic key allows the respective user to enter a productcode associated with another product of the plurality of products at aninput/output interface of the controller.
 17. The method of claim 16,wherein enabling the one or more actions for configuring the systemincludes enabling, upon receiving the key data for the respectiveelectronic key, product code inputs at the input/output interface. 18.The method of claim 17, further comprising switching, by the controllerresponsive to receiving an input at the input/output interfacecorresponding to the product code for the another product, fromdetecting the correspondence between the scan information for therespective item and the first product to detecting a correspondencebetween the scan information for the respective item and the anotherproduct.
 19. The method of claim 13, wherein the first scanning devicecomprises a RFID scanner for detecting a key stored on a RFID chip. 20.The method of claim 13, wherein the respective scan information includesa magnetic code associated with one of the plurality of products.